Christie wants GOP control over ‘voting mechanisms’
Chris Christie calls for Republican control of "voting mechanisms" so that Republicans can win more elections.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks at a news conference at Bristol-Myers Children’s Hospital at Robert Wood Johnson University October 07, 2014 in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
When it comes to Republican governors imposing harsh, new voting restrictions, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) is hardly the first name that pops up. The Republican vetoed an early-voting bill last year, he’s offered some odd criticisms of same-day registration recently, and he played some shameless political games when scheduling his state’s U.S. Senate special election last year, but in general, Christie isn’t known for electoral mischief, at least not by contemporary GOP standards.
But that’s all the more reason to take note of Christie’s comments this week on “voting mechanisms.” The Bergen Recordreported this morning:
Governor Christie pushed further into the contentious debate over voting rights than ever before, saying Tuesday that Republicans need to win gubernatorial races this year so that they’re the ones controlling “voting mechanisms” going into the next presidential election.
Christie stressed the need to keep Republicans in charge of states — and overseeing state-level voting regulations — ahead of the next presidential election.
In remarks to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the New Jersey governor said, “Would you rather have Rick Scott in Florida overseeing the voting mechanism, or Charlie Crist? Would you rather have Scott Walker in Wisconsin overseeing the voting mechanism, or would you rather have Mary Burke? Who would you rather have in Ohio, John Kasich or Ed FitzGerald?”
In theory, in a functioning democracy, control over “voting mechanisms” shouldn’t dictate election outcomes. Citizens consider the candidates, they cast their ballots, the ballots are counted, and the winner takes office. It’s supposed to be non-partisan — indeed, the oversight of the elections process must be professional and detached from politics in order to maintain the integrity of the system itself.
So what exactly is Chris Christie suggesting here?
One possible interpretation is that Republican victories will lead to control over elections, which in turn will lead to more Republican victories. If this is what the governor meant, Christie almost seemed to be endorsing corruption.
A more charitable interpretation is that the governor thinks Democrats will try to cheat, so electing Republicans will ensure the proper “voting mechanisms.”
Still, political scientist Norm Ornstein paraphrased Christie’s comments this way: “How can we cheat on vote counts if we don’t control the governorships?”
Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans' War on the Recent Past."
White House
Trump’s apartheid-friendly ambassador to South Africa takes role
Ja’han Jones
A whistleblower complaint about Tulsi Gabbard has been kept from Congress for months
Ja’han Jones
DOJ’s misconduct complaint dismissed against judge in Alien Enemies Act case
Erum Salam
Congress
Pressed on religious bigotry, Speaker Johnson makes an ugly problem even worse
Steve Benen
House Democrat unveils impeachment resolution targeting Pam Bondi
Steve Benen
As too many Republicans push anti-Muslim messaging, GOP leaders remain silent
Steve Benen
Supreme Court
Why Gorsuch brought up how drunk John Adams and James Madison got ‘back in the day’
Jordan Rubin
The Supreme Court rulings that could help Luigi Mangione avoid execution
Jordan Rubin
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s financial moves cause needless problems
