There’s a showdown in Texas on Tuesday to choose the Democrat who will run for the U.S. Senate from that state. Texas voters choosing to participate in the Democratic primary have a choice between the dynamic firebrand Rep. Jasmine Crockett and the soft-spoken but eloquent state Rep. James Talarico not only to take on whoever the Republican nominee is, but also to try to put an end to a 30-year streak of Democrats losing statewide elections in Texas.
In Talarico and Crockett, we see avatars of the two main strategies Democratic campaigns have employed for the last 20 years.
While you may not know it, given the online chatter and commentary from national pundits with no on-the-ground knowledge of Texas, Democratic primary voters there are actually very excited about their choices. Crockett’s favorable ratings are slightly higher than Talarico’s, but both are well liked. In Talarico and Crockett, we see avatars of the two main strategies Democratic campaigns have employed for the last 20 years. Should the party seek the median voter, hold the base and flip Republicans? That’s what Talarico says he can do. Or should the party focus on firing up the base and converting nonvoters into voters, which is Crockett’s strategy?
No matter which of them wins on Tuesday, when the campaign music stops, that winner will immediately have to set about mending fences and building bridges after a campaign that went from “bless your heart” to “don’t mess with Texas” faster than Ted Cruz books a flight at the sign of snow.
Follow MS NOW’s midterm elections live blog for the latest updates and analysis on today’s biggest races across Texas, North Carolina and Arkansas.
Democrats weren’t thinking a lot about Texas in the 2026 midterms until Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s aggressive, unprecedented and anti-democratic redistricting scheme effectively redistricted many House Democrats out of power. That not only led to a scrum for other congressional seats, it also changed who would run for Senate.
While there is some question about who was “supposed” to run, the state lawmaker Talarico, who had been building a following with his Christian progressive speeches across the state, first announced that he was running for U.S. Senate in September. Crockett, the two-term House representative, jumped in the race in December. Unlike Talarico, who was relatively unknown outside his district, she entered with a national reputation for sparring with Trump and Republicans and a long record of constituent service in her district.
Talarico almost always says the right thing in public, but organizers and activists I have spoken to have taken offense to Talarico’s messaging that he is more electable than Crockett, and see that as a dog whistle that Crockett is too Black and too loud, and — being a woman on top of that — can’t win. There’s frustration throughout the Democratic Party that the party wants Black people’s campaign labor and Black people’s votes but considers Black candidates too risky for high-profile swing races.
There’s frustration throughout the Democratic Party that the party wants Black people’s campaign labor and Black people’s votes but consider Black candidates too risky.
(When asked if all the talk about “electability” had been a dog whistle in their race, Talarico told Politico, “I guess it can be. I believe Black women are electable.” But he said his concern was Crockett’s belief that she doesn’t have to win over any of Trump’s voters.)
Compounding Talarico’s problem with Black voters is the allegation that he referred to former Rep. Colin Allred (who’s running again for the House) as a “mediocre Black man” in an off-the-record conversation. In a statement Talarico admitted to using the word “mediocre,” but he said he was calling Allred’s campaign mediocre, not Allred himself.
“I described Congressman Allred’s method of campaigning as mediocre — but his life and service are not,” Talarico said in a statement. “I would never attack him on the basis of race.”








